<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think Before You Hack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tentonnebaby.com/2006/10/03/think-before-you-hack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tentonnebaby.com/2006/10/03/think-before-you-hack/</link>
	<description>Discussion on Web Technologies, Design and London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oli</title>
		<link>http://www.tentonnebaby.com/2006/10/03/think-before-you-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Oli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedstream.com/2006/10/03/think-before-you-hack/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually really happy that all of the strange layout issues I&#039;ve seen so far in IE7 are not bugs - the rendering behaviour seems like a massive improvement on 6. I wrote about this as I caught myself assuming that a broken layout was due to a browser bug - I think the first rule of diagnosis is to be objective and not make assumptions!

Hacking is always the easy route, but leaves you with a fragile codebase that is hard to maintain. I also think taking the proper time to understand a technology is also much more rewarding on a personal level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually really happy that all of the strange layout issues I&#8217;ve seen so far in IE7 are not bugs &#8211; the rendering behaviour seems like a massive improvement on 6. I wrote about this as I caught myself assuming that a broken layout was due to a browser bug &#8211; I think the first rule of diagnosis is to be objective and not make assumptions!</p>
<p>Hacking is always the easy route, but leaves you with a fragile codebase that is hard to maintain. I also think taking the proper time to understand a technology is also much more rewarding on a personal level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.tentonnebaby.com/2006/10/03/think-before-you-hack/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.embeddedstream.com/2006/10/03/think-before-you-hack/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>When working with someone else&#039;s software, it&#039;s interesting how it&#039;s all too easy to assume that you are always in the right and anything that&#039;s not perfect is a bug.

This isn&#039;t just a problem in IE - I&#039;ve seen some horrendous hacks in code that I&#039;ve reviewed and more often than not it&#039;s a lack of understanding of the given framework (.NET, Java, whatever) that&#039;s caused the reliance on &quot;hacking until it works&quot;.

I do think that the negative press that IE has got up until now has just exacerbated this problem, no matter now unwarranted it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When working with someone else&#8217;s software, it&#8217;s interesting how it&#8217;s all too easy to assume that you are always in the right and anything that&#8217;s not perfect is a bug.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t just a problem in IE &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen some horrendous hacks in code that I&#8217;ve reviewed and more often than not it&#8217;s a lack of understanding of the given framework (.NET, Java, whatever) that&#8217;s caused the reliance on &#8220;hacking until it works&#8221;.</p>
<p>I do think that the negative press that IE has got up until now has just exacerbated this problem, no matter now unwarranted it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

